Mon Sep 10 13:44:00 GMT 2001
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:30:15PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:17:16PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >>Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>> >I'm not wild about using something called NONAMELESSUNION to control
> >>> >whether a nameless *structure* is defined but I guess it's ok.
> >>Never the less, the MSDN will have the control on how this is
> >>implemented if it applies in this case. Or is NONAMELESSUNION something
> >>we've made up along the way?
> >I just checked.
> >It's a Microsoft invention and the use it the same way, so I guess
> >we're "good company".
> Are you going to check this in, Earnie? It seems like it should go into
> the (mythical?) 1.3.3 cygwin release.
Are you asking if I'm going to check in the change that you made or are
you asking if I'm going to check in a change that is a reverse of what
you did? In first case it's already checked in, in the second case I'll
let Danny make the change to the MinGW CVS and I'll merge in the changes
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Cygwin-patches