Fri Sep 21 16:27:00 GMT 2001
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:44:42PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:22:32PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 02:56:00PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>> >> >Did you try `strace -j'? The valid options work the invalid option
>> >> >brings up Dr. Watson.
>> >> Yes. I tried using options that didn't exist since that is the reason
>> >> for the _argv patch.
>> >Strange!? Differences between NT4 and W2K? Should I apply the patch?
>> I tried this on W2K and Windows 95. It's odd that it would work on
>> both of those.
>> I just tried a fresh rebuild from CVS. It still works fine. Odd.
>You're saying you don't need the patch????!! You're saying that you
Earnie, I try not to check in changes which don't build for me. So,
no, I do not need your changes. I guess when I said:
"This does not crash for me. It builds and runs fine on both linux and
I should have added "without any patching".
However, if I did need something like your changes, I would not just
check something in that just allows strace to build but results in a
More information about the Cygwin-patches