[PATCH]Package extention recognition (revision 2)
Fri Jan 25 14:34:00 GMT 2002
My fault, we discussed this on cygwin-apps when you where adding package
support to cygcheck.
I was looking for a clear and easy to read solution ;}. I don't think
that supporting foo.tar.bz2.tar.bz2 needs to be an objective though :}.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Package extention recognition (revision 2)
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 02:59:17AM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
> >And that test is still there, I moved it into the if () so something
> >".tar.bz2" wouldn't trigger the return .... : 0; If all the ifs
> >return 0; still occurs.
> Hmm. Seems like someone has "improved" this code from when I wrote
> My version checked for a trailing component. If it existed, it
> the index into the string.
> This version sort of does the same thing but if there is a .tar.bz2
> anywhere in the string prior to trailing component, it will fail
> regardless of whether the filename ends with .tar .tar.gz or .tar.bz2.
> Perhaps that is an acceptable risk but it puzzles me why anyone would
> move from an algorithm that was foolproof to one that wasn't.
More information about the Cygwin-patches