[PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log

Michael A Chase mchase@ix.netcom.com
Mon Jan 28 20:45:00 GMT 2002

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
To: <cygwin-patches@cygwin.com>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 20:25
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com>
> To: <cygwin-patches@cygwin.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:00:36PM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
> >
> > I don't know how Robert prefers this, but it is customary to provide a
> > single patch file not a bunch of separate attachments.  With one patch
> > file you can just say
> Yes please, one  patch is nicer.

Sorry.  I got confused and thought it was the other way around.

What about the compress_gz.error() and compress_bz.error() messages.  The gz
one is commented out and the bz one isn't.  Should they be the same?  If so,
which is preferred?  I lean toward writing both as long as they are going to

Mac :})
** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. **
Ask Smarter: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.htm
Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day.
Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.

More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list