help/version patches

Christopher Faylor cgf@redhat.com
Tue Feb 26 04:12:00 GMT 2002


On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:23:51PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Well, cygpath is wrong.  cygcheck is wrong too, under this scenario, but
                          ^^^^^^^^
                          strace
>not quite as wrong since it at leasts puts the version in its own
>string.  I believe, it used to do something similar to cygpath but I
>changed it, intending to, someday, make it use cvs versions.

cgf



More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list