ip.h & tcp.h

adah@netstd.com adah@netstd.com
Mon Apr 8 19:55:00 GMT 2002

OK, I am trying again.


Definitions for struct ip, tcphdr, and udphdr from BSD are added.

I hope I can do better next time. Sorry for not reading the contrib page 
very carefully.


Wu Yongwei

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:56:37AM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote:
>ChangeLog: BSD-style header files ip.h, tcp.h, and udp.h are added, which
>include definitions for IP, TCP, and UDP packet header structures.

>* ip.h.diff is against /usr/include/netinet/ip.h
>* tcp.h.diff is against /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h
>* udp.h should be added to /usr/include/netinet
>* ip.h in /usr/include/cygwin contains only a comment and I suppose it 
>be dropped.
>BSD licence:
>1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>   notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>   notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
>   documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
>3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
>   must display the following acknowledgement:
>     This product includes software developed by the University of
>     California, Berkeley and its contributors.
>4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
>   may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
>   without specific prior written permission.
>Best regards,

1) Patches just to cygwin-patches, please.

2) Your ChangeLog is incorrect.

3) Please submit 1 (one) patch for everything rather than one patch per 
   It just makes a reviewer's life harder if you submit multiple patches 
   attachments.  If your mailer allows you to submit patches inline 
   screwing up spacing that is preferred.

4) The diffs and ChangeLog should make it very obvious what is being 
   There is no need for more words at this point.  If this was your first
   submission asking for a change to Cygwin, then, sure, add a 
   You've already beaten this subject to death, however, so there is no 
   for more justification.

None of the above is a show stopper except for 2.  As I predicted, your
ChangeLog is incorrect.  Go back to the web page that I keep mentioning
to see why.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/attachments/20020408/0e12160c/attachment.htm>

More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list