Performance: fhandler_socket and ready_for_read()

Conrad Scott Conrad.Scott@dsl.pipex.com
Tue Jul 30 18:11:00 GMT 2002


"Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com> wrote:
> Unless you disagree, would you mind just adding a
> get_r_no_interrupt method to fhandler_socket,
> using the same criteria as your ready_for_read stub?

No disagreement there, that's cleaner.  See attached for a new
patch.

> Thanks for finding this, by the way.  A speed improvement in
> socket handling is very welcome.

Thanks.  And yes, after this patch cygserver with sockets is still
not as quick as with named pipes, but it's made up a lot of
ground.

> Sounds like it is time for a 1.3.13 release.

Ominous numbers those . . .  I'm just glad I'm not superstitious
:-)

// Conrad

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ChangeLog.txt
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/attachments/20020730/5f18d8d6/attachment.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: get_r_no_interrupt.patch.txt
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/attachments/20020730/5f18d8d6/attachment-0001.txt>


More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list