regtool support for custom key separators

Christopher Faylor
Wed Aug 7 14:26:00 GMT 2002

On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 05:18:31PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 02:28:24PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> >I'm re-sending this because the original message had BASE64 attachments.
>> I can't find any sign of a cygwin assignment on file from you, Igor?
>> Have you filed one:
>> cgf
>No, I haven't.  I thought I didn't need it for small patches?  I must
>have misunderstood the instructions.  I'll file one asap.

This is a relatively small patch but it is adding new functionality so I
feel more comfortable if we have an assignment.

However, I'll probably apply it anyway on your assurance that you're filing
an assignment now.

>An unrelated question (and this should have been a separate message,
>but since you quoted that part specifically): were the original
>attachments filtered out because of the missing assignment?  Or is
>there some problem with pine's base64 attachments?  I've seen other
>people use pine, which was what confused me when my attachments didn't
>show up.

The mailing list doesn't filter attachments. I don't know what happened.
It is set to reject html and several other types of attachments but you
should get a bounce not a silent filtering of the email.


More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list