[PATCH] performance patch for /proc/registry -- version 2
Thu Mar 27 09:40:00 GMT 2003
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 04:47:26PM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >However... am I doing something wrong? I'm trying to find out what the
> >performance improvement is on my XP box and both versions of the DLL
> >(w/ and w/o your patch) are running 7.5 minutes for
> > ls -lR /proc/registry > /dev/null
> >Or is that only a problem on older systems? You're running NT4SP5, right?
> >Other than that your patch looks fine.
> It may be that XP has the WIN32 API fixed. The different is drastic
> on my NT4 SP5 box. You can see the difference just by doing
> ls -l /proc/registry/HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE. With patch comes back instantly,
> without you have to sit and wait.
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Cygwin-patches