thunking, the next step
Fri Nov 14 13:19:00 GMT 2003
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 23:58, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I'm wondering if we couldn't get rid of that strlen call. These
> functions already get a Windows path. This path is constructed by a
> call to path_conv::check(). check() already scans the path so it
> should be simple to add a length field to path_conv, which could
> be used when calling the IOThunkState constructor.
> Right? Wrong?
Probably yes. Passing length in (i.e. pascal style strings :}) would be
I've got a short term goal of a *working* stupidly long paths cygwin
first though :}.
I'm not hearing any 'your concepts are stuffed' feedback though, which I
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Cygwin-patches