For masochists: the leap o faith
Fri Nov 14 23:53:00 GMT 2003
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> For the record, I don't have any problems with changing PATH_MAX to
> CYG_PATH_MAX as a first step for this change. Small steps are, as
> always, appreciated.
Ok, so thats done.
What about, for a next step, simply the introduction of the thunk layer
- with only A calls used by it. No Unicode, no length changes. ?
Thats probably the most verbose change, with the least variety in
approach. From there on in we can debate the relative merits of
path_conv state versus IOThunkState and the like without a huge patch in
More information about the Cygwin-patches