[Patch]: secret event

[Pierre A. Humblet]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> 
> I agree, with one nit.  Was there a reason for getting rid of the handle
> protection in this patch?  We are apparently stumbling over a problem with
> handle corruption in the current CVS so removing a chance for protection
> seems like we're going backwards.

The previous code was assuming that a handle would never change from
inheritable to non-inheritable (or conversely) and was protecting it
accordingly.
That's not true anymore and I don't know how to protect in that situation.

I have seen the DEBUGGING_AND_FDS_PROTECTED stuff, but I am not sure
if/how it works.

Pierre