Tue Apr 13 12:21:00 GMT 2004
On Apr 12 20:09, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> At 06:48 PM 4/12/2004 -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
> >On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >> I have also observed abnormal behavior on NT4.0
> >> 1) ls uses ntsec even on remote drives without smbntsec
> >> /> echo $CYGWIN
> >> bash: CYGWIN: unbound variable
> >Ok, I'm confused. Either I don't understand what you're saying, or
> >the following from the Cygwin User's Guide is too dificult to interpret
> >(no)smbntsec - if set, use ntsec on remote drives as well (this is the
> There is a third possibility: inaccurate documentation.
> /eroot/src/winsup/cygwin: grep 'smbntsec.*=' *.cc
> /eroot/src/winsup/cygwin: grep 'ntsec.*=' *.cc
> environ.cc: allow_ntsec = true;
Hmm, yes, the allow_smbntsec flag is not set by default and I have no
idea when that disappeared, actually. Should we revert that or should
we better keep it as it is? Somehow I have the vague feeling that we
have less complaints about Samba file access for a while...
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:email@example.com
Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Cygwin-patches