Fix dup for /dev/dsp
Thu Jul 22 15:15:00 GMT 2004
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 10:58:00AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 11:25:19PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>>>Is it worth to delay 1.5.11 until those issues are sorted out?
>>>No, I don't think so.
>>>We do have people reporting problems with MapViewOfFileEx and with
>>>threads in perl, now, though. So, 1.5.11 is not quite cooked.
>>Unfortunately, the problems with MapViewOfFileEx are elusive and hard
>>to reproduce, even for some of those people reporting them (i.e., me
>>:-}). Since they aren't critical for me (I can just re-run the command
>>if I get one of those), I personally don't mind if 1.5.11 is released
>>without a fix (unless there's something I can do to help track them
>>down sooner). I don't speak for Volker, though.
>I share Igor's opinion. 1.5.11 as it is solves a fair number of
>annoying issues. Regarding /dev/dsp, I would apply Gert's latest
>patches. It's progress, and not an impediment to making more progress
Sorry but I disagree on both counts. 1) I don't want to release cygwin
with a known regression and 2) I don't want to apply a patch that I
don't entirely agree with in the hopes that someone will "do it the
right way" at some nebulous point in the future.
I could possibly be convinced about 1 but I'm rather adamant about 2.
More information about the Cygwin-patches