[Patch] cygcheck: warn about empty path-components

[Christopher Faylor]

On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 07:46:11PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>Bas van Gompel schrieb:
>>Op Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:18:13 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
>>in <20041009231813.GD11984@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>:
>>:  On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 12:41:20AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>>[licensing/CA]
>>
>>I'll be staying with the trivial patches until further notice...
>>
>>Are CA-issues also on-topic for the licensing-ml?
>
>This would be second message then on the licensing-ml.
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-licensing/
>"Please ask questions here if you are unclear about Red Hat licensing or 
>Cygwin's standard GPL licensing."
>I don't thing that cgf wants simple CA questions on the licensing-ml to 
>keep the archive clean.

I'm sorry but I don't know what the "CA" acronym stands for.

Cygwin Assignment, maybe?  If so, yes, cygwin-licensing is a better place
to ask questions.

cgf