[Patch] cygcheck: warn about empty path-components

Corinna Vinschen vinschen@redhat.com
Mon Oct 11 08:58:00 GMT 2004


On Oct  9 19:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> When I was at Red Hat, I tended to be slightly more lenient about
> assignment obligations for things in the utils directory.

I certainly don't object if we keep it this way.

> Corinna, do you think you could ask you-know-who if we could get a
> waiver for cygcheck changes?  It doesn't seem like cygcheck provides
> any core cygwin functionality.
> 
> We might even consider changing the license if Red Hat is amenable.

I've written a mail to you-know-who (I guess it's the same you-know-who
as the you-know-who you were thinking of), asking if we can change the
licensing of the utils directory to something relaxed (BSD, actually).


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.



More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list