Mon Feb 7 15:36:00 GMT 2005
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 10:38:23AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Feb 7 01:13, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:53:48PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>> >Reentrancy isn't actually required, but no reason not to do it. I have
>> >compiled net.cc but not done any other testing. Did I mention that
>> >dup_ent is really neat?
>> Thank you. That solved a few problems when I implemented it.
>> You'd think it would have occurred to me that you could use it in this
>> This is fine with me, if it is ok with Corinna.
>I like it, but it's a bit over the border for a trivial patch. I'd be
>willing to let slip this through, though. Yitzchak, any plans to send
>a copyright assignment form to Red Hat? That would be nice and would
>keep me from further ticking off. ;-)
>However, CVS seems to be broken somehow. I can't check it in. Stay
I wanted to find out what was wrong with CVS, so I just tried checking this
in. I had no problems fortunately (or unfortunately, depending on how you
look at it).
More information about the Cygwin-patches