patch to allow touch to work on HPFS (and others, maybe??)
Mon Feb 7 21:37:00 GMT 2005
So, what it really seems to boil down to is
for those filesystems that support doing timestamp
updating via FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES (NTFS systems)
we should use FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES, and for those that
don't (HPFS, etc), they should use GENERIC_WRITE?
Unfortunately, during my brief perusal of MSDN, I didn't see
an easy way to determine the file system type.
I also see from the message you quoted that ntsec comes
into play, but I think it still goes back to the filesystem, since
I have ntsec set, and the touch works on my box (using NTFS,
on our PDS shares (also running NTFS, I assume), but not
on my OS2/HPFS box.
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:19:25 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Feb 7 09:34, Mark Paulus wrote:
>> Attached is a patch that works to allow me to do a
>> touch on my mounted HPFS filesystem. I'm not sure
>> about clearcase, or others, but it works on HPFS and
>> * times.cc: Use GENERIC_WRITE instead of FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES.
>That's reverting a more than three years old patch. Please read
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00666.html which explains why
>opening with GENERIC_WRITE is not generally a good idea. If you want
>to get it working for HPFS or whatever, use the FS flags present in
>the local path_conv variable called win32 to conditionalize the call.
>Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
>Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:email@example.com
>Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Cygwin-patches