[PATCH]: "decorate" gcc extensions with __extension__

Christopher Faylor cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com
Thu Mar 31 01:21:00 GMT 2005

On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 06:10:42PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>As I noted previously, I thought it could be a source of confusion
>since this behaviour is not documented and is not widely know.

?: *is* a documented gcc extension.

>I, myself, had to rummage through the GCC source code to be absolutely
>certain what the implict behavior was.

Wow.  Rummaging through the source.  Incredible.

"info gcc" is your friend.

No.  We're not going to change the use of ?:.

More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list