[patch] Don't append extra NUL to registry-strings.
Mon Sep 5 10:03:00 GMT 2005
On Sep 4 05:05, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> Op Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:21:19 +0200 schreef Corinna Vinschen
> in <20050829082119.GA24845@calimero.vinschen.de>:
> : On Aug 28 22:49, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> : > Hi,
> : >
> : > When RegQueryValueEx returns a string-type, the final NUL is included
> : > in the returned size. I suggest dropping it.
> : I see what you're up to, but there would be two reasons not to drop the
> : trailing \0. First, the \0 is part of the "file content" in a way.
> Don't file-systems have their own way of reporting ends (EOF)?
Er... that doesn't matter, does it? What we have here is a virtual file
system which allows access to the "file" content of registry keys. The
_SZ keys contain what the type name suggests, zero-terminated strings.
The trailing \0 is part of the "file" content as defined by MS. There's
no gain in just removing it without notice.
> : Second, it would break backward compatibility with applications using
> : /proc/registry. This latter point concerns me a bit, though it can
> : naturally only affect Cygwin applications.
> Hmmm... :( ... possibly the CYGWIN-environment-variable might have room
> for something like ``registry:raw,data'' (default, for now) to mean
> ``as is'', and other options might cause various levels of verbosity/
> interpretation... (I know SHTDI, but would P be TC for such a thing?)
That sounds like a lot of trouble for... what exactly? What are you
trying to accomplish which can't be handled by a simple filter, say,
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:email@example.com
Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Cygwin-patches