[PATCH] <asm/byteorder.h> missing prototypes warning
Sat Apr 4 15:50:00 GMT 2009
On Apr 3 11:08, Yaakov S wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to move newlib's _ELIDABLE_INLINE definition to
> > some nicely matchin header like _ansi.h and then use it wherever it
> > fits?
> As I said, perhaps there is a better way of dealing with this. The main
> reason I didn't go for that solution in the first place is that I didn't
> find other newlib/cygwin headers that would require this. If there are
> indeed more, then centralizing this makes perfect sense.
I've applied this patch using the _ELIDABLE_INLINE macro.
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
More information about the Cygwin-patches