sys/socket.h: define SOL_IPV6?

Corinna Vinschen
Mon May 4 07:43:00 GMT 2009

On Apr 27 00:31, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:22:07PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >Does it make sense to define SOL_IPV6 now?  Patch attached if so.
> I think it does.  I've checked in this patch.  I'm sure Corinna will
> revert it if I am wrong.

It's not wrong but unfortunately it won't help either.  The only SOL_xxx
option supported by Winsock is SOL_SOCKET.  But since we already have
the other SOL_xxx options defined, it's a good idea to have SOL_IPV6
defined as well.


Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list