[PATCH] implement /proc/sysvipc/*

Corinna Vinschen corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Fri Apr 1 15:59:00 GMT 2011


On Apr  1 11:34, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:05:56PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Chris, do you think there's anything speaking against rearranging this
> >so that the FH_FS and FH_NETDRIVE definitions are separate from the
> >stuff under /proc?  Or, hang on, we should change all PROC values,
> >along these lines:
> >
> >  FH_FS      = FHDEV (0, 247),  /* filesystem based device */
> >  FH_NETDRIVE= FHDEV (0, 246),
> >  FH_DEV     = FHDEV (0, 245),
> >
> >  FH_PROC    = FHDEV (0, 244),
> >  FH_REGISTRY= FHDEV (0, 243),
> >  FH_PROCESS = FHDEV (0, 242),
> >  FH_PROCNET = FHDEV (0, 241),
> >  FH_PROCESSFD = FHDEV (0, 240),
> >  FH_PROCSYS = FHDEV (0, 239),
> >  FH_PROCSYSVIPC = FHDEV (0, 238),
> >
> >  FH_PROC_MIN_MINOR = FHDEV (0, 200),	/* Arbitrary value */
> >
> >Then we can simplify the isproc_dev definition like this:
> >
> >#define isproc_dev(devn) \
> >	(devn >= FH_PROC_MIN_MINOR && devn <= FH_PROC)
> >
> >Does that sound ok?
> 
> Yes.  I was, for a while, trying to keep the device numbers the same as
> Linux but I don't think that even applies in this case.

Cool, thanks.

Yaakov, would you mind to apply youir patch with this change?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat



More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list