[PATCH] Add an additional relocation attempt pass to load_after_fork()
Wed Apr 6 11:54:00 GMT 2011
On 05/04/2011 17:21, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:03:43PM +0100, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>> On 04/04/2011 15:39, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I'm trying to imagine a scenario where it would screw up to just do the
> reserve_upto + "reserve the low block" and I can't think of one. It's
> potentially a little more work, of course, but I think it may catch the
> more common failing conditions so it shouldn't be too noticeable.
>>> If so, it seems like we're allocating and freeing the space up to the DLL more
>>> than once. I think we could avoid doing that.
>> For performance reasons, I think you are right. Or do you mean there is a
>> correctness issue with that?
>> If you indicate your preferences I'll respin the patch.
>> 1) Combine passes 2 and 3
> I'd prefer this. If we can get people test the snapshot maybe we an
> figure out if a separate loop is useful.
Updated patch attached.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
More information about the Cygwin-patches