Improvements to fork handling
Wed May 11 18:49:00 GMT 2011
On 11/05/2011 12:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:21:14AM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>> On 11/05/2011 10:13 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:59:53AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> On May 11 02:18, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>>>>> Please find attached five patches [...]
>>>> Oops, wrong mailing list...
>>>> Btw., it would be nice if you could create patches with the diff -p flag
>>>> as well. It's not exactly essential, but IMHO it's quite a help when
>>>> trying to review patches.
>>>> Another problem is this: While you provide separate patches, you don't
>>>> provide separate ChangeLogs. That makes it kind of hard to apply them
>>>> separately. Would you mind to create one ChangeLog per change?
>>> Ditto. This really needs to be broken down into easier to review chunks.
>> All right. Let's try this again with the correct mailing list.
>> The patches have been generated with diff -p, and each includes
>> appropriate changelog entries. Hopefully the changes are split up finely
>> enough because I don't know a good way to break them down any further.
>> For posterity's sake I'm including the original message body below.
> Please: One patch per message. One ChangeLog entry per message, not
> sent as a diff.
Done. Please disregard the older (bundled) versions because I found a
couple of glitches in the patches which the the 1-per-email set fixes.
More information about the Cygwin-patches