Improvements to fork handling (1/5)
Mon May 23 01:36:00 GMT 2011
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 04:29:18PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>...I'd prefer that the testing be done in frok:parent when the
>child_copy happens for static and dynamic dlls, maybe by adding a dll
>function which first checks that the data/bss can be copied to the same
>location as the parent.
Actually, no, I think there's a better way to do that. I'll check something
in in the next couple of days.
I think the rest of your patches have merit too so I'll be checking those
in as well. Thanks for all of your work.
More information about the Cygwin-patches