[PATCH] clock_nanosleep(2)

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net
Thu Jul 21 18:51:00 GMT 2011

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 12:37 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Given our current discussion to change cancelable_wait, does it make
> sense to review this patch?  

No, the cancelable_wait changes need to go first.

> AFAICs the clock_nanosleep function will have to be changes quite a bit, right?


> Something else occured to me, but I think we should do this in an extra
> step, if at all.  IMO the family of sleep functions should be moved out
> of signal.cc into times.cc.  It just seems to belong there.

I'm not sure what the gain would be.


More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list