Extend faq.using to discuss fork failures

Jon TURNEY jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk
Thu Nov 3 16:35:00 GMT 2011


On 30/08/2011 14:41, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> That sounds reasonable, though I suspect we'd want want to keep the concluding
> bits in the FAQ as well. Unfortunately, summertime free time has come to an
> end so I don't know when I'll get to this next. Perhaps a good compromise for
> now would be for you to post only the first FAQ question? That would at least
> cut traffic to the cygwin ML a bit.

I've updated Ryan's patch to hopefully address the comments made, polished the 
language a bit in places, and split it into a patch for the FAQ which just 
says how to fix problems and a patch for the UG which contains the technical 
details.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: faq-fork-failures.patch
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/attachments/20111103/5142d92d/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ug-fork-problems.patch
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/attachments/20111103/5142d92d/attachment-0001.ksh>


More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list