Extend faq.using to discuss fork failures
Fri Nov 4 13:34:00 GMT 2011
On 03/11/2011 21:05, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I would still prefer eschewing actively negative words like "hostile" and just
> neutrally stating that Windows does not use a fork/exec model and does not offer
> any easy way to implement fork.
Hmm, yes, I'll fix that.
> I'd also like to see specific errors mentioned so that when people are searching for
> a solution to the problem they will be able to find it in the FAQ.
Is there something wrong with the itemized list which follows that sentence?
More information about the Cygwin-patches