New modes for cygpath that terminate path with null byte, nothing
Wed Aug 15 05:11:00 GMT 2012
On 8/14/12 10:02 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:49:17PM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>> On 7/27/2012 2:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> There's just the problem of the copyright assignment. If you want to
>>> provide a non-obvious patch, or if the patch adds new functionality, we
>>> need a copyright assignment from you. Please see the section "Before
>>> you get started" on http://cygwin.com/contrib.html and the assignment
>>> form http://cygwin.com/assign.txt
>>> As soon as my manager has the assignment, I'll apply your patch.
>> Do you guys still want the patch (and papers that go with it)? If so, could I
>> discuss the particulars of the assignment off-list somewhere?
> As I mentioned, it seems like you can easily get the functionality
> you're looking for by using standard Cygwin tools so, IMO, we don't need
> your patch.
I didn't know what the final decision was; that's why I asked. Corinna
said she wanted the patch. As for the feature itself: piping through
tr is fine, but having cygpath output paths in the desired way in the
first place keeps error information around (without pipefail, $? is
tr's exit status) and involves fewer forks. There's precedent in "echo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 235 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Cygwin-patches