[PATCH] suggestion for faster pseudo-reloc.

JonY jon_y@users.sourceforge.net
Mon Sep 3 11:02:00 GMT 2012

On 9/3/2012 18:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep  3 17:34, JonY wrote:
>> On 9/3/2012 11:05, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> On 9/2/2012 1:51 PM, Jin-woo Ye wrote:
>>>> Now it is clear that this patch would be needed other relevant projects
>>>> such as mingw, mingw-w64. thanks for your effort on simplified one.
>>> Yes, while it is not required that all of those systems stay exactly in
>>> sync, there has been some effort in ensuring that the pseudo-reloc
>>> implementation used by all three remains very similar if not identical.
>>> Please bring this patch to the attention of the mingw.org and
>>> mingw64.sf.net people, if it's not too much trouble.
>>> --
>>> Chuck
>> Original message already forwarded to mingw-w64 devel list. Thanks
>> Jin-woo Ye.
> Do you want the patch I eventually applied, too?
> Corinna

Yeah, that will be good too.

I forwarded the CVS commit message too. I'm not sure if anybody else is
more suited to comment on it than Kai, he is still on vacation though.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/attachments/20120903/2c9c21e8/attachment.sig>

More information about the Cygwin-patches mailing list