[PATCH 64bit] Fix speclib for x86_64
Sun Feb 17 17:18:00 GMT 2013
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 06:09:44PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Feb 17 11:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 02:41:41PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On Feb 17 04:46, Yaakov wrote:
>> >> 2013-02-16 Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@...>
>> >> * Makefile.in (libcygwin.a): Move --target flag from here...
>> >> (toolopts): to here, to be used by both mkimport and speclib.
>> >> * speclib: Omit leading underscore in symbol names on x86_64.
>> >The Makefile patch is fine, but for the speclib change I wonder why
>> >we should omit the leading underscore. If you remove the underscore,
>> >you're polluting the application namespace. Is there really a good
>> >reason to do that? Did I miss something?
>> Doesn't the x86_64 target forego leading underscores on normal variable
>My dictionary returns ambiguous results for the word "forego",
>so I answer that generically:
I mispelled "forgo".
>On x86_64 there's no underscore prepended to symbols.
So, why would we add an underscore? Does binutils add underscores to
these *_dll_iname symbols anyway?
More information about the Cygwin-patches