[PATCH 0/3] Add more winsymlinks values
Christian Franke
Christian.Franke@t-online.de
Wed Jul 21 10:24:13 GMT 2021
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 19 17:31, Jon Turney wrote:
>> I'm not sure this is the best idea, since it adds more configurations that
>> aren't going to get tested often, but the idea is that this would enable
>> proper and consistent control of the symlink type used from setup, as
>> discussed in [1].
>>
>> [1] https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2021-May/041327.html
> Why isn't it sufficient to use 'winsymlinks:native' from setup?
>
> The way we express symlinks shouldn't be a user choice, really. The
> winsymlinks thingy was only ever introduced in a desperate attempt to
> improve access to symlinks from native tools, and I still don't see a
> way around that. But either way, what's the advantage in allowing the
> user complete control over the type, even if the type is only useful in
> Cygwin?
>
WSL compatible symlinks introduce several issues with non-Cygwin
Copy/Archive/Backup tools (robocopy behaves strange, 7-Zip stores these
as empty files, ...). If WSL itself is not used on a machine, there is
possibly no benefit using such symlinks for Cygwin there.
I usually prefer the old "magic" cookie SYSTEM files, in particular on
portable installs for "rescue" purposes. Patch 2/3 would allow to select
these.
+1 from me for this enhancement.
Christian
More information about the Cygwin-patches
mailing list