typical cygwin bug communications (long)

[Robert McNulty Junior]

Dave Korn wrote:

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cygwin-talk-owner On Behalf Of One Angry User
>>Sent: 06 December 2004 14:13
>>To: Talk Amongst Yourselves
>>Subject: Re: typical cygwin bug communications (long)
>>
>>On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I am trying to compile openoffice and it says "syntax error".
>>>>
>>>>Please help!
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>When will the port be finished?
>>>
>>>Gerrit
>>>      
>>>
>>Yeah, I want my OpenOffice NOW!  You Cygwin guys SUCK!  Why 
>>can't you be
>>more like LINUX?!!!  And don't tell me that you're MEAN -- I 
>>KNOW you are!
>>
>>O. A. User
>>The Lusers Forum
>>-- 
>>`. The 50-line signature with a meaningless legal disclaimer 
>>goes here .'
>>    
>>
>
>  Your socks are showing!  You can't hide from me behind an X-X- header!
>
>  
>
>>Received: from unknown (HELO slinky.cs.nyu.edu) (128.122.20.14)
>> by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 2004 14:12:45 -0000
>>    
>>
>
>  Heh, you didn't even bother to use an open proxy in Argentina or Korea.
>Amateur!
>
>  Damn, M$ Outlook is clueless[*].  If I hit "Reply all" to that post, I get a
>reply with just one address in the To: header, "Talk Amongst Yourselves".  But
>if I only hit the single "Reply" button, I get a reply with two addresses in it,
>"Talk Amongst Yourselves" and the "Blaaab Babble Boogle Bop" one as well.
>
>  So Microsoft must reckon 1 > 2.
>
>  Maybe it's going to be part of their new advertising campaign:
>
>     Freedom is Slavery.
>      War is Peace.
>       Ignorance is strength.
>        Reply to author is Reply to all.
>
>   Bill Brother is watching you!
>
>    cheers, 
>      DaveK
>
>[*]  Ok, ok, I know that's stating the obvious: what I mean is "..even _more_
>clueless than we already knew it to be..."
>  
>
Use Moxzilla. Its better and updated daily.
I use it now.
I feel more secure.
Outlook is outdated and unneeded.