tetex 2.99

Dave Korn dave.korn@artimi.com
Mon Jan 17 17:42:00 GMT 2005


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-talk-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: 17 January 2005 17:14

> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:01:28PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 02:09:04PM +0100, Dr Jekyll wrote:
> >>Hi, the tetex package of Cygwin is not up to date. Have 
> anyone here succeed
> >>in installing the tetex 2.99? Can you share your 
> experience? I'm done!
> >
> >Good point.  You can't just indiscriminately assume that DLLs are not
> >executable since that would mean that the user would have no way to
> >control this behavior.
> >
> >OTOH, I don't think we automatically have to flag DLLs on a
> >non-acl-aware FS as executable either.  Currently DLLs always show
> >up as executable.  I don't know how much work it would take to change
> >this and I'm not particularly inclined to look into it but this is
> >probably somewhere in the stat_worker function.
> 
> Yes.  I meant to do that.



That's something I say quite a lot when I'm playing pool.


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....



More information about the Cygwin-talk mailing list