Proposed FAQ in DocBook (Attn: tetex maintainer)

Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes sthoenna@efn.org
Sat Aug 6 19:45:00 GMT 2005


On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:36:54PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> There's nothing wrong with dropping support for some part of a
> bundled toolset in a new package release.  The only things I'm asking for
> are a) that this be announced, and b) that, if that part of the toolset is
> important, alternative packaging options are discussed on cygwin-apps
> beforehand, rather than having people find out after the fact.  If this is
> unreasonable, please let me know.

Only unreasonable if you don't have a time machine :)



More information about the Cygwin-talk mailing list