Proposed FAQ in DocBook (Attn: tetex maintainer)
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
sthoenna@efn.org
Sat Aug 6 19:45:00 GMT 2005
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:36:54PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> There's nothing wrong with dropping support for some part of a
> bundled toolset in a new package release. The only things I'm asking for
> are a) that this be announced, and b) that, if that part of the toolset is
> important, alternative packaging options are discussed on cygwin-apps
> beforehand, rather than having people find out after the fact. If this is
> unreasonable, please let me know.
Only unreasonable if you don't have a time machine :)
More information about the Cygwin-talk
mailing list