-mno-cygwin, huh?, wha? [RE: Pbm with ar.h when compiling make-3.80 for mingw]

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 07:31:38PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 15 February 2006 19:27, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Thanks, Dave, for your continued vigilance.
>>
>>Is there something (besides hippos) in the water or something?  We seem
>>to be getting an increased number of non-cygwin "problem reports"
>>recently.
>
>
>Yeh, I've noticed, the situation looks real bad.
>
>In fact you might even say it mings!

I wonder if it would matters at all if we just got rid of the
-mno-cygwin option entirely.  I don't mind making a mingw
"cross-compiler" part of the requirement for building cygwin and maybe
it would make the issue really clear.

cgf