Microsoft acquired SysInternals?
Jonathan Arnold
jdarnold@buddydog.org
Wed Nov 8 15:18:00 GMT 2006
Dave Korn wrote:
> On 08 November 2006 14:12, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>
>> Well, it was bound to happen sooner or later...
>
> The acquisition was some time ago as it happens; it was fairly widely
> discussed at the time.
Yup, and I was just waiting for the hammer to fall.
>> The surprising thing is
>> that they only started redirecting to the Microsoft site yesterday (the
>> day before I showed one of my colleagues how to download Process Explorer,
>> and it was still the old SysInternals.com site).
>
> And guess what! The scumbags have withdrawn all of sysinternals' source
> codes, using the bogus 'explanation' that it might cause "integration problems
> [...] with other Windows components". MS is acting like the worst cliched
> stereotype of itself. <spit>
And that was it exactly. What an incredibly bogus explanation! And to do it so
"breathlessly" to make it sound like it even made sense:
http://blogs.technet.com/sysinternals/archive/2006/10/30/sysinternals-site-migration.aspx
"Source Code: The number of source code downloads didn't justify
the migration, support, and possible integration problems it might
cause with other Windows components down the road."
Ack. Gag me with a spoon already. "Justify" indeed.
--
Jonathan Arnold http://www.buddydog.org
When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
More information about the Cygwin-talk
mailing list