[ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 22
Christopher Faylor
cgf@redhat.com
Thu May 3 12:34:00 GMT 2001
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:48:56AM -0400, Suhaib Siddiqi wrote:
>>IMHO your behaviour is contra-productive, since AFAIK all Cygwin DLLs
>>will have now a cyg prefix instead of lib.
>
>I am not going into any more discussion. If you read the mail list
>from last week. Chris Faylor mentioned "cyg prefix is considered
>depricated...." So ARE ALL THE DLLs are going to CYG PREFIX? I guess
>NOT.
I was being a little facetious about deprecating the cyg prefix. It is
ok for stuff that is used internally to cygwin, or cygwin-xfree but I
don't think it name to a *product* Cygsomething.
So cygz.dll is appropriate for shared libraries and will continue to
be appropriate for the foreseeable future.
cgf
More information about the Cygwin-xfree
mailing list