fork + dlls
Christopher G. Faylor
cgf@cygnus.com
Thu Aug 20 20:56:00 GMT 1998
In article <m0z9Gp9-0010zOC.cygnus.gnu-win32@malasada.lava.net>,
Tim Newsham <newsham@lava.net> wrote:
> When you manually load a dll, and then perform a fork, the dll
>is not accessible from the child process. When you think about what
>is going on here, it makes sense. My question though is, is this the
>way fork should behave? Or should (could) the fork code reload the
>dll in the child process after a fork? It seems that this would
>more closely follow the expected fork semantics.
If you use UNIX semantics (dlopen) to load the .dll then the .dll
should be automatically loaded on a fork.
--
cgf@cygnus.com "Everything has a boolean value, if you stand
http://www.cygnus.com/ far enough away from it." -- Galena Alyson Canada
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list