mounts, ls, and filename completion

[N8TM@aol.com]

In a message dated 8/20/98 4:39:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
sarnold@coyote.rain.org writes:

> How about just documenting the behavior of the mount command?

and the similarities and differences of symlink (ln -s)
I get the impression that one can't count on it working after the contains of
a symlinked file are changed.  Maybe that's why mount is recommended, but
mount is too permanent, while ln -s is too impermanent.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".