To _USE_ or not to use InstallShield? WAS: Re: B19: InstallShield reports: "WinExec failed: return=20" after 99% completion
Andrew Dalgleish
andrewd@axonet.com.au
Wed May 6 22:13:00 GMT 1998
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Zow" Terry Brugger [SMTP:zow@mdbs.com]
> Sent: 1998 May 06, Wednesday 22:48
> To: 'Marty Leisner'; earnie_boyd@yahoo.com
> Cc: gw32
> Subject: RE: To _USE_ or not to use InstallShield? WAS: Re: B19:
> InstallShield reports: "WinExec failed: return=20" after 99%
> completion
>
> Let me throw in my 2 bits in favour of the InstallShield installation
> (since it seems that someone needs to). There are all sorts of
> idiosyncrasies with the windows environment that installers must deal
> with: the registry is a prime example.
[Andrew Dalgleish]
I use a .BAT + .SH to setup workstations.
The .SH does a "cat" to a .REG file then calls REGEDIT.
I use IS5 for work, and I think whatever you can do with IS5, you can do
with bash, and then some.
Cheers.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list