gcc produces foo.exe, not foo
Thu Sep 24 19:59:00 GMT 1998
> As for the rationale for adding the automatic .exe, I'm somewhat in
> favor of, if not thrilled by, such "native compliance"; for mingw32, it
> makes perfect sense (must have .exe to jive with native system and also
> be executable by native shell); for cygwin32, bash can run programs
> with or without .exe, but have trouble when running with native shell.
Since MS seem to be trying to hide file extensions in their user
interfaces these days, I wonder how long it will be before they drop
the filename extensions on executables all-together and start using some
attributes in the file system?
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"email@example.com" with one line of text: "help".
More information about the Cygwin