gcc produces foo.exe, not foo
Earnie Boyd
earnie_boyd@yahoo.com
Mon Sep 28 13:35:00 GMT 1998
Is their a reverse of the linker option --force-exe-suffix?
I've tried --noforce-exe-suffix and that doesn't work.
You can create a filename without an extension by appending a .
character to the name but this would not be very convenient.
==
- \\||//
-----------o0O0--Earnie--0O0o------------
-- earnie_boyd@yahoo.com --
-- http://freeyellow.com/members5/gw32 --
--------------ooo0O--O0ooo---------------
PS: Newbie's, you should visit my page.
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list