gcc produces foo.exe, not foo

Fergus Henderson fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU
Tue Sep 29 21:47:00 GMT 1998


On 28-Sep-1998, Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Is their a reverse of the linker option --force-exe-suffix?
> 
> I've tried --noforce-exe-suffix and that doesn't work.

Did you try `--no-force-exe-suffix'?
                 ^

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: < http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh >  |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3        |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".



More information about the Cygwin mailing list