gcc produces foo.exe, not foo
Tue Sep 29 21:47:00 GMT 1998
On 28-Sep-1998, Earnie Boyd <email@example.com> wrote:
> Is their a reverse of the linker option --force-exe-suffix?
> I've tried --noforce-exe-suffix and that doesn't work.
Did you try `--no-force-exe-suffix'?
Fergus Henderson <firstname.lastname@example.org> | "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: < http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh > | of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger email@example.com | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"firstname.lastname@example.org" with one line of text: "help".
More information about the Cygwin