Cygwin NT DDK Project
Mumit Khan
khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU
Tue Aug 31 23:49:00 GMT 1999
"Chris Telting" <telting@sprynet.com> writes:
>
>
> That's all that's needed? It only requires a keyword and code to generate
> the fastcalls which is minimal. Even I can do that. If that's what's
> needed then
> I volunteer to do it myself. I also know as a fact that the linker needs to
> be
> changed.
I had an implementation of fastcall a long time ago, but never added it
since nobody asked for it. I can dig it out and send it to you if you
want to play with it. It requires a change to the backend to handle
the special calling convention (from what I remember, it was a cross
between regparm and stdcall), but as far as I can tell, no change
to linker necessary. Could you please explain why you think the linker
needs to be changed to support it?
> There actually needs to be a flag set in the pe header in order for it to be
> a
> valid but again that's minimal.
Please elaborate why fastcall requires PE header flag change. I'm going
through the MSDN docs right now, but that always takes a while. Pointers
welcome.
Regards,
Mumit
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list