G77 fork problems
Suhaib M. Siddiqi
Ssiddiqi@InspirePharm.Com
Sun Jan 31 23:52:00 GMT 1999
Yes for your first comment.
Second, i was thanking him. He deserves many more thanks for his
friendly and detailed answers whenever I wrote to him.
And by the way thanks to you to for this kind of e-mail.
Suhaib
Original Message -----
From: Craig Burley <burley@gnu.org>
To: <Ssiddiqi@InspirePharm.Com>
Cc: <khan@xraylith.wisc.edu>; <d.love@dl.ac.uk>; <ssiddiqi@ipass.net>;
<gnu-win32@cygnus.com>; <egcs-bugs@cygnus.com>; <burley@gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: G77 fork problems
>>Actually G77 way of handeling FORK makes more sense to
>>me -- personally.
>
>Could you elaborate? I thought Mumit had explained g77 *doesn't*
provide
>a wrapper for fork(). Do you mean you prefer the interface Mumit
>provided in his (sample) wrapper? If so, he's the one to thank, not
>g77!
>
> tq vm, (burley)
>-
>For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message
to
>"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
>
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list