b20.1 chmod does not work right

Suhaib M. Siddiqi Ssiddiqi@InspirePharm.Com
Wed Mar 31 19:45:00 GMT 1999

>Steven van Dijk wrote:
>> I obviously fouled something up since it worked OK previously, but I
>> don't know what. The last major configuration change I did was
>> installing DirectX 5.0 for NT

What did you do? Installed the DirectX 5 for Windows 98 on Nt 4.0?  That
will realy *fouled a lot of things, not only somethings*

There is not DirectX 5.0 NT and will not be for a long time.

>Huh??? Last I checked, the only DirectX for NT was 3.0, included in
>Supposedly, there were no plans to support later revisions of DirectX
>NT until NT5.0 ne' Win2000 came out. What's the story?
>> and I don't see how that could change
>> things. I took a recent snapshot to see if it helped but it didn't.
>> Help?
>Want to unsubscribe from this list?
>Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

More information about the Cygwin mailing list