b20.1 chmod does not work right

[Charles Wilson]

Steven van Dijk wrote:

> I obviously fouled something up since it worked OK previously, but I
> don't know what. The last major configuration change I did was
> installing DirectX 5.0 for NT

Huh??? Last I checked, the only DirectX for NT was 3.0, included in sp3.
Supposedly, there were no plans to support later revisions of DirectX on
NT until NT5.0 ne' Win2000 came out. What's the story?

> and I don't see how that could change
> things. I took a recent snapshot to see if it helped but it didn't.
>
> Help?


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com