New symlinks
Christopher Faylor
cgf@redhat.com
Mon Feb 26 21:23:00 GMT 2001
I've finally taken the time to play with the new symlinks. I like them!
However, I noticed that when I do this:
ln -s bar foo
cat foo.lnk
I get the contents of bar.
Should I? Or should I get a "file not found"? Or should I get
the contents of foo?
This is somewhat analogous to cygwin's behavior with .exe in some
situations but I'm not sure that we should ever expose the fact that a
symlink now has a .lnk extension to the user.
Comments?
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list